08 October 2010

Nuclear Myths I

Myth 1: Nuclear power is bad for the environment.

Fact : In today's world, our top priority concern is actually global warming. This is because, the abundant releases of carbon emissions through combustion is getting higher daily. How do we know? The proof are the melting of the North and South Pole. Besides that, our daily outdoor temperature has increased at least 3-5 degree Celsius. The heat is making our Earth unbearable to stay on. Do you know that if our body temperature changes more than 4 degrees Celsius we will fall sick? So like wise, if our surrounding temperature is increasing, we might not be able to live on this earth comfortably. For extra explanation, imagine the whole world is like the Sahara Desert, you don't want to live in such heated conditions. As engineers we need to find solution so that this earth can still be exists for say the next 100 years. We need to find sustainable solution without compromising mother nature. Now, the best solution we have is nuclear power to fulfill the escalating demand of electricity.



As repeated, nuclear energy is actually the best solution to green house effect and global warming. Why? This is because, nuclear energy does not release any significant amount of carbon emissions. Do you know that coal, petrol and natural gas power plant is a major contributing factor for green house effect? Besides these power plant, vehicles are the next major contributors. That's why scientist and engineers are gearing towards hybrid or electrical power car to stop or minimize vehicles to contribute to global warming. This same application goes to the power plant. Let me explain further.



Unlike cars which can be powered by electricity, power plant cannot be powered by electricity. This is because, power plant produces electricity itself. Car on the other hand is used to transport people from point A to B. Likewise, power plant needs some sort of "initiating energy" to be converted to this electrical energy that we are happily using. As the Principle of Conservation Energy says energy can only convert from 1 source to another. Hope you can understand this fact.

Of course, people will start to debate on nuclear waste and renewable energy such as wind, geothermal and hydroelectric. But we will come to that soon. That's all & thank you!! =)

P/S i am so sorry as i cant reply any comments regarding the Xenon topic due to insufficient time and incomplete the proper study to provide you all accurate and satisfying answer. However we have not given up and still doing a major reading throughot regarding this topic. So please be patient. Thank you for being great commentators and viewers

47 comments:

  1. Actually,i didn't agree with myth 1.This is because it was already proven that nuclear source of energy is clean,carbon-free and cost-effective..
    YOGASWERAROW A\L SREE RAMALU
    ME084029
    yoges.sphinx_cruisevirgo88@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. i have to disagree that nuclear energy is the best solution to green house effect and global warming as there are other ways which go not produce as much energy but is way cheaper and has less risk.wind,solar,hydro and many more are so much safer and much suitable to our weather.

    harsukhvir singh godrei
    sukh_x@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. sukh: i have a few questions for you..

    1.why do you think other source of energy is cheaper?

    2.May you define, how is the cheaper meaning?

    3.Do you ever realised, how many hydro damn can be build in peninsular Malaysia?

    4.Do the wind breeze in our country sufficient to generates windmill?

    KIndly, think think about above questions, then you will understand why nuclear is one of the best energy source...^^)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I never thought that nuclear would be one of the cleanest way to generate electricity. I couldnt agree more. And yes, now I think is actually a less polluting way to produce energy. Everytime, people are complaining about the weather, how hot is Malaysia. This can be a very effective way to overcome that particular problem. Cost also should be managable as this is a very good investment. This will actually attract more private companies and interests from other countries to join in and support the funds needed.


    Ang Jit Yong (ME083530)
    aplox3@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nuclear energy had existed for decades, it is widely used in the united states, canada and most parts of europe. I am not opposed to the development of nuclear energy in our country. Why, after all this years we haven't venture into this energy? to say that we couldn't afford it in the past, we have plenty of oil rigs and we spend a lot of money importing coal. Why didn't we consider nuclear in the past?

    Muhamad Rifdy Bin Samsudin
    CE083444
    ed_dy12@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would like to share some information with my friends.
    1. Emissions of gaseous pollutants of any kind from nuclear power stations are alomost nil on an ongoing basis.This due to the enclosed surroundings in a power plant.

    2.There is no technical or cost impediment in reducing thermal emissions of nuclear power plants to rivers or bodies of water.The usage of closed loop cooling system takes care the problem of thermal emmision.

    If we realized the two main problem regaring global climate have been taken care of.So it is right to say that nuclear energy is green!

    Govinderan Mageswaran
    ME083544

    ReplyDelete
  7. People nowadays has been exposed on how efficient the nuclear power is.By now i hope that in Malaysia, the government will start developing the nuclear power plant as soon as possible towards a country with efficient, less pollutions and energy saving..go green Malaysia..

    Mohd Ehsan Bin Chik Hisham
    CE082151
    m_ehsan55@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. As the author mention vehicle in this article, just imagine if all the vehicle in this world using nuclear power. What will happen to the nuclear power when we dont want to use the vehicle anymore?? As all of you know that uranium when burnt generate more fuel. For example, we will only use a car for at most 15 years, while the nuclear power will last more longer than 15 years. So, after 15 years what should we do with the nuclear power?

    Syarifah Nur Hamizah Bt Syed Kasim
    ME083650
    ija_rc@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi,I have a few question to ask. Does the usage of nuclear power for vehicles are the same with fuel?Like we have to directly fill in the nuclear into our car.If it is to be directly use by vehicles like that,it would be harmful when the nuclear produce the wastage after it generates energy to move the vehicles. I know it is safe when we manage the nuclear in power plant but what about the nuclear that we use in our vehicles? however, if it is not directly used on our vehicles it would be fine. Sorry if i lack of information on how the nuclear power is used on vehicles.

    Amiro Iqbal Bin Mohd Aminudin
    ME084618
    amiro_aminudin@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Chew n the gang..
    Hope you are all fine with the hustle n busyness in UNITEN's life...anyway there are a few things I object based on the comments of students n yr column above...
    1-Based on our research in thermodynamic class wif Mr Syaiful..the best energy to be harvest which is the condition in Malaysia right now/probably the world is through solar thermal energy..this is because the solar that ALLAH gave to us is sooo abundant..why do humans have to harvest things which is harmful to itself..
    2-Yes, i agree with a few that the fuel for nuclear could last in longer time but do we realize that after it is not efficient enough where do we dispose it n could we believe that these people could handle the nuclear power plant in good hands..to compare the affect with solar energy none of above should be worried about..besides are we grabbing the fame of having a nuclear energy in Malaysia or are we giving to these few crooks exploiting tax payers $ for themselves without thinking decently or the most importantly are we using the right conscious mind...seek to GOD as he knows better than u do..coz he is the creator of all kind
    MOHAMED NABEEL B SIDEK
    ME083582
    nabeelsidek@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. before i read this article i thought that nuclear power is bad for the environment. but this article has shown that i wrong. tq fellas

    muhammad fikri bin baharudin
    fiq.bahar@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. hallow guys...
    here i just have a few question for you all.i also don't know what it nuclear power meaning.SO i just want to know what your opinion what is when in malaysia we have a power plant for it??

    khuzaimi bin kamaruddin
    acai_otai@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  13. Instead of rushing into nuclear energy, research should be done on better ways to harness and use solar energy

    YANG GUO XIAN (ME083672)
    iainygx@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. hye..

    i'm not the host of this blog but i would like to answer mr Amiro's question.Correct me if i'm wrong...

    i think there will not be cars using nuclear energy like fuel we are using now...but there might be electrical cars that using electrical energy that has been produced by the nuclear energy plant...

    by using the electrical cars on that time, there will be no carbon emitted from the cars and at the power plant hence, our environment will not be polluted...

    thats all that i know..
    once again do correct me if i'm wrong..

    thanx

    Muhammad Fahmi Bin Abd Talib
    ME083597
    fahmee107@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  15. Solar energy is not only green and safe but also environment friendly, so it will help in reduction of melting of glaciers and elnino/extreme temp. which are caused by emissio of carbons into the atmosphere, so myth one is out of the line

    Almutairi Abdulmajeed Khatimo CE092377
    ma7ed100@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. i agree with chew, countries like india, pakistan has advance in generating electricity via nuclear power. this nuclear power have been used since decades, and its proven as a reliable source. nuclear energy does not release any carbon emission unlike fossil fuel. malaysia should progress quickly because when it comes to nuclear technologies, we are moving at a slow pace.
    GULSHANJIT SINGH(ME083709)
    shanjitscsa@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  17. hi chew,i agree with ur post supporting the usage of nuclear.however,what i would like to know is,will there be any waste materials produced from the emission of nuclear energy from the power plants?if there is,wouldn the radiation affect the environment?

    DINESH A/L RAGURAJAN
    (ME083537)
    dineshdpau@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  18. I totally agreed that the best solution to green house effect and global warming is to turn to nuclear energy as it not release any significant amount of carbon emissions. Before the global warming effect getting more critical, I think it is time for us to turn to nuclear energy. Rather than saying nuclear power is the "alternative" way to solve global warming problem, I think it is the best to say it is "the only way" of solution to green house effect and global warming

    ENGKU AHMAD AZIZAN HAFIDZI
    ME083540
    eazizan90@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. i agree that nuclear energy is the best way to overcome the green house effect....but from what i read nuclear energy produces radioactive waste due to nuclear fission and it take hours or maaybe years to diminish....so wont this contibute to other environmental problems.

    DARSHAN A/L NAMASIVAYAM
    ME 083535
    darshan.bigd@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with nuclear energy as the greenest way to provide power/electricity.Malaysia do get alot of sunshine to generates the solar panels.But will be that be enough during the night as people do need electricity at night.Malaysia doesn't get enough wind breeze to generate electricity throughout the country.Windmill is not the best obviously.And yes, Malaysia is a good ground for building dams for hydro-power. But is it a smart investment by the government to explore and rip the forests and reserves to built these dams? I believe a nuclear reactor alone is enough to generates power as much as generated by dams.
    The only constraint is the fund to build a nuclear reactor. UAE, interested in building one already splashing USD 40 billion for their nuclear-power program with cooperation with the US. Saudi Arabia meanwhile had announced a joint initiative with Japan's Toshiba and US' Shaw Group and Exelon.How do the Malaysian government response in term of enormous funding for nuclear-power program?

    Wong Chee Meng (ME082755)
    tidus_henry21@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. 'SUP!
    I didn't totally disagree about what you said that nuclear reactor can solve the green house effect, but don't you think it will be more expensive to get the raw material such as uranium?? and will it be safe if there is an accident between two nuclear generated cars? and won't the radiation is hard to be controlled if thousands of this mini-generator moving around the world?

    Fasnor Hesyam Bin Faisal
    me086029
    ronsaf17@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  22. Nuclear energy is said to be safe and clean to be used. its not that harmful and does not support greenhouse effect. Therefore it is wise to implement it. But yet it do have waste which we call nuclear waste. By thinking of the ways to reduce and suitable ways to dispose the nuclear waste products, it will much more efficient to have the usage of nuclear in Malaysia.
    We are spending tons of money in getting a new energy source.Why don't we spend a bit more of money to build a best disposal method or the waste produced!!

    NANTHAR PERREMAL
    ME083607
    nanthar_chelsea@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. nuclear energy is not a high cost energy resource compared to others. this is because the Uranium that had been used during its fission process can be reused to make another fission process. that means the amount of uranium used to produce energy will be low...

    Muhammad Ridhwan Bin Abd Halim
    ridhwanhalim@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well... Malaysia does seem to be a very good country to harness the plentiful resource of the sun. But do not forget that Malaysia is constantly raining. A nuclear power plant also takes up much less space compared to a solar power plant. After a little more research, solar power plants costs quite a lot. I'm on the nuclear power plant's side this time.

    Jan Siong Lim
    ME083552
    jansionglim@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  26. I hope we can have our own nuclear powerplant because it can save our environment by producing zero co2 emission and the nuclear fuel is not so expensive and easy to transport.this is the alternative way that we have right now to solve the global warming problem.
    Mohd Safuan Bin Zolkapli
    ubi_revenge@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. i agree with the statement that nuclear energy is the "green energy" energy production method.but still i have this doubt in my mind,what are the possiblity for the nuclear power plant to destory in explode ?and what are the side affects to the human and also the nature ?

    KUMARAN A/L SOMASUNDRAM
    ME083565
    kmrn_siva@yhaoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  29. From an environmental perspective, nuclear energy can't be beaten. No belching smokestacks or polluting gases. It releases nothing into the atmosphere - no carbon dioxide, no sulfur, no mercury.so,this is the answer for our future enrgy source.

    FARID ASNAWI AHMAD
    ME081809
    nawi_fender@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  30. Salam...
    I agree that Nuclear Energy is one of the solutions for green house effect but is our country really ready for it. First of all budget comes first and location of the plant will be a major issue.
    I think Malaysia won't be ready to spend on another mega project (energy) in 20years time, lets see what Bakun Dam would offer us for the time being... :)

    Khairul Amirin Bin Amir Hussain
    CE080110
    deafening_silence84@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  31. may i ask, As for the industrial and commercial sectors, can they change their operations to be green?

    izzatun nadia binti harun
    me086266

    ReplyDelete
  32. Actually i disagree with people say that nuclear energy is carbon-free.It because nuclear energy have less carbon-intensive than fossil fuel.There is no carbon-free energy.But i have to agree that for our future we need this nuclear energy.Lot of benefits we can get such as low-long term cost thus it can powering our economy in the future.By the way nice blog

    Ahmad Aizat B Arifin
    artseni14@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  33. emm, i think it is nothing wrong to do with nuclear energy..all we need to do is just to improve this great nuclear power into a better stage..overcome all its poorness and make it more environmental friendly than it used to be..

    nik zakaria bin nik mustoffa
    me083873
    nik_nod32@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  34. nuclear energy was already proven,it's clean and free carbon.for me to use this tecnology is very nice n safe. however, before we use this tecnology,we should reseach more about nuclear energy,because cost to build nuclear energy is very expensive

    ALIF AHNAF BIN OMAR
    alip04macro@gmail.com
    me084145

    ReplyDelete
  35. Can explain why nuclear is considered as cheap energy as the construction for a nuclear reactor takes 4-6 years, I bet the construction only will be costing multi billion Ringgit and would it be cheaper compared to that of a renewable energy power plant?
    Thirukumaran a/l Ramasamy Chettear
    Me083655
    thiru_5519@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  36. At first I thought nuclear power is bad for the environment. After reading articles about nuclear power, nuclear power plant really good technology for our country. It can replace our renewable sources of energy in our country. In addition, the efficiency output of energy such as solar, wind and water is actually very limited.

    FATIN NORAIN BT AHMAD SABRI
    ME083981
    fna_90@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  37. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  38. from this article, it is proved that myth is wrong. i also know more about the nuclear energy. so,i think Malaysia must have nuclear power plant in order to prevent the global warming. this is because nuclear energy is the green technology. thx 4 the information...


    MOHAMAD ASHIFF BIN KAMALUDIN(ME083578)
    ars_shiffy@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  39. As a matter of fact, I do not know that our body will fall sick if our body temperature changes more than 4 degrees Celcius. Can somebody or anybody care to explain that?

    WAN MOHAMED AFIF BIN WAN MANSOR
    afif_blackcat@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  40. Global Warming is one of the major hazards that surround our planet, our jop is to find ways to prevent the increasing of the warming more! which as mentioned in the begining of the article goes back to CO2 release to the air.so if Nuclear as proved in many countries can reduce Carbon significantly! i think there is no excuse stopping us from starting using this Energy ..
    Anan Issam Alnajjar - CE084206
    annanalnajjar@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  41. Nuclear power produces clean cheap safe energy.

    With newer reprocessing technology's, the amount of spent fuel has been reduced to minimalistic amounts...

    Spent fuel = 96% Is reprocessed, 1% is plutonium (reprocessed also) and only 3% is a wasted product...

    1Kg of enriched fuel produces the same amount of electricity as of 160 tonnes of coal... That means 30g of waste is produced instead of 160 tonnes of coal being burned uncleanly.

    30g of containable waste is a good environmental trade off for not putting 160 tonnes worth of coal CO2 into the air. Nuclear power has POSITIVE environmental effects.

    naderaj
    (me086092)

    ReplyDelete
  42. It is told that nuclear energy is a GREEN technology, but based on this article (http://www.mysinchew.com/node/39341), Water and Energy Consumer Association of Malaysia (WECAM) Secretary-General S. Piarapakaran said that, "...a clear point Malaysians need to understand is that nuclear energy is LOW-CARBON technology, NOT GREEN technology..."

    So now I'm confused. What's the difference?

    Mohamad Fakhruddin b Suparin
    ME083579
    fakhruddin_azzahrawi@yahoo.co.jp

    ReplyDelete
  43. hi..
    i strongly disagree with myth 1.. Actually many scientist have do research due to nuclear energy and it was already proven that nuclear source of energy is clean,carbon-free and cost-effective..so i think we should give support to our government to build nuclear energy in malaysia..tq.

    wan khairi hakimi bin wan abdul aziz
    ce083464
    wankhairi_90@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  44. Exposure to the Radioactive Material Can Be Deadly, Causing Health Problems and Cancer: Through the history of nuclear disasters we have had a living lab to see the numbers of deaths caused by nuclear power plants along with infertility, health problems, and deadly cancers among people in communities even far away from the original site.

    MUHAMMAD SADIQ BIN ANIPAH
    ME083602
    realphatslim@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  45. hi there,
    i agree with myth no.1 but why don't we use other renewable energy since it is natural compare to nuclear energy. Even though nuclear energy is Eco-friendly let say something wrong with the nuclear plant and tend to explode,what we going to answer to those who lose their loved ones due to the explosion of it radioactive features.
    M.VIVAN
    CE083462
    naviv.viva@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  46. I agree . The culprit that is causing global warming is the emission of carbon and heat from cars, factory, air conditioner,and etc.i've never thought about nuclear to be our only choice to reduce global warming.and now it is . i will fully support the usage of nuclear energy.

    EYU ZHI MING
    ME083541
    invader81@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  47. ''In today's world, our top priority concern is actually global warming'',so based on a source ,
    it takes carbon dioxide 100-200 years to sink into the atmosphere,so even if we stop all our emmision this instance,it will stil take a hundred years atleast for the global warming to settle down.I dont fancy nuclear energy,as its propotion of risk to benefits is unimaginable,therefore opting for other resources is much better.Although it will take more time using other resources,to reduce global warming,it is safer and this is not somthing that we can achieve overnight.

    OM GAJENDRA KUMARAN
    ME083617
    ogk_om@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete